Who can describe a site, when it can describe itself? DISCLAIMER: for the self-critical, self-aware, self-humored ONLY.
The truth should not equal a seat in Hall of Fame
Published on January 10, 2004 By Poi Dog In Sports & Leisure


Short and simple: when all else fails, say you're sorry so you can give a rebirth to your dead career.

Pete Rose has come clean too many years too late. It really isn't the question that he was a gambling man, or that he gambled on baseball, or that he even bet on his own team. History has already judged him. Rose finally comes clean after the media haunts and sports goons have completed their feeding frenzy, when it is finally safe to say the truth in the hopes that a seat in Cooperstown will be readied for him.

And he isn't even sorry.

Perhaps in retrospect, Pete Rose would have been in a far better position today if he had originally come clean and shown remorse. Who can say he would be a Hall of Famer given the past? All I can be positive of is that I am against Rose's endorsement. His 'wish to show personal ethics' is a publicity stunt, and does not warrant any good deeds by the fans, the general public, or Major League Baseball. His autobiography should collect dust on the shelves, and his name should serve as a warning to others who may follow in his footsteps. The Hall of Fame should be reserved to those who celebrate the game, the history, the magic, and the ethics of good sportsmanship, and not for a star baseball player who corrupts the game as he sees fit.

The truth spoken by good 'ol Pete should simply seal his fate where it lies now: on the wayside, full of memories of glory and shame.
Comments
on Jan 12, 2004
I have to say I agree with you. I always believed he should be in, but the admission of betting on a game as he sat in a dugout, is stretching acceptability to an extent that I can't accept and save face for the Hall of Fame . Ironically, it is because he admits wrongdoing he will be inducted and I will, once again, be in the minority as to the issue (a place I spend most of my time). Sory Pete, but what the man says is right.
on Feb 04, 2004
the thought that rose hasn't "celebrated the magic / history ... bla bla" is all bull sh%t. He was a baseball player period. He should be know for what he did with the game and not with his life. If you knew anyting about praising baseball and its history you would know that rose respected the game the same way any real player would. He went balls to the wall each and every day and that was his job (yes); but more so his love. The reason he holds the record and the reason that fans were "wow'ed" for years by his performances was due to his respect for all that baseball is and was. Don't you dare critique his place in the hall on what gambling problem he may have had in real life. That's just ridiculous and idiotic on your part. Personally i think if you actually knew about the "magic" that REALLY goes into baseball, that you'd realize just how stupid your humble opinion really is

p.s. don't take it out on rose cause you were just some dufus who never made it past right field in 12-year-old little league; leave it to someone who really knows about the "ethics" of not only baseball, but the pure joy of doing something they love